THE  OTHER week I mentioned one of my petrolhead pals was threatening to  blow five thousand of his carefully earned pounds on a Triumph Stag.
Luckily, he saw sense at the last minute and decided not to; he decided  to chuck seven and a half bags of sand at one instead. That’s £7,500 on a  1970s convertible best known – unfairly or not - for its penchant for  rotting and munching through head gaskets at the first hint of  overheating. To make matters worse, even if you bag a really good one  it’ll still struggle – and I’ve seen the fuel bills to prove it – to top  25 to the gallon. 
However, all of this pales into comparision with the really unhinged bit  – almost immediately after doing the deal, the mate in question lobbed  the keys in my direction and insisted I had a go. I returned half an  hour later with an enormous grin on my face – and not even remotely  envious! 
The tricky thing with the Stag is that while not being superlative or  extraordinary in any one particular field, it covers all the bases with a  caddish charm that’s surprisingly hard to pin down in print. It’s so  difficult to define what underpins the Stag’s essence that it’s actually  easier to associate it with things which have the same delightfully  dated and yet somehow cool sense of aspiration. Things which are, in  other words, a bit stagulent. 
Roger Moore, for instance, is stagulent, as were his attempts to charm  Britt Ekland in The Man With The Golden Gun. Velour jackets and polka  dot shirts (especially worn together) are stagulent, as is playing golf.  Flying on Concorde was always a bit stagulent, as are Joanna Lumley,  Directors Bitter, the whole of Harrogate, and reruns of The Persuaders!.  Cars other than the Triumph Stag can be stagulent too; try the Jaguar  XJ-S, or today’s BMW 6-Series Convertible and the Jaguar F-type. 
That’s why you’ll either ‘get’ Triumph’s V8-engined, Italian-styled,  leatherette-lined cruiser or you won’t. It’s not the fastest, the nimblest,  or best-built car you’ll ever drive but the looks, the rumble of the 3.0  litre engine when you shove the automatic gearbox into kickdown and the  way it just lollops along effortlessly acts an automotive passport to  some parallel world where everything is a bit more stylish, albeit in an  irredeemably gaudy sort of way.
In short the Triumph Stag is thirsty, badly-made, not especially fast  and looks like it’s escaped from a casino in 1970s Monte Carlo. I love  it.
Image courtesy of Classic Car Weekly and Sam Skelton 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
